Graze wrote:
> Hi all
> Ive been asked by the wifes sister to teach my 11 year old niece
> some guitar.
> She already plays clarinet by reading music (but is bored with it) and
> is a good singer.
> Before her mum and dad shell out for an acoustic, (lets face it at 11
> it could be a fad) they asked if I could teach her as at present,
> there are no places in the guitar lessons at her school.
> My starting point seems to be showing her the basic chord shapes (E A
> D), and getting the right hand to make a nice easy rhythic stroke
> using a pick. My plan would be to increase the chord library (C G Em
> Am etc..) and some basic chord theory with a view to her being able to
> play a few Avril Lavine songs, my theory being that if she can play/
> sing her fave songs quite quickly, it will generate more relevence and
> interest.
> Is this method is a good one? I dont want to start her off on the
> wrong foot. What do you think??
My niece is learning classical guitar at school and (as youd expect)
there are no chords at all, just individual notes, time signatures and
reading music.
Its terribly, terribly dull, and because of this she never picks up the
thing outside school.
Id teach her all the major, minor, and seventh chords (get a wall
chart), with barre forms, and then get some sheet music for her fave
artist where she can just use the chords to start off with. If she
needs something odd like a major 7th or a minor 6th, its usually
pictured in the book anyway. She already knows how to read music, so
knocking out chords isnt quite such a Bad Thing as it might otherwise be.
When shes become attached to the instrument, you can do scales and note
positions; then she can use her clarinet knowledge if she wants.
A curious thing is that some proper musicians dont really understand
chords; my wife teaches piano and has never heard of a dominant seventh
or a suspended fourth, even though she plays them all the time.