bruce phipps wrote:
> What is a good recording level to aim for when tracking?
> Normally, I aim for about -6dB as measured on n-Tracks recording
> level meter. My Windows Line In recording volume is set to 90%.
> This gives me a bit of headroom if required. (16 bit recording).
The headroom is important, as with digital recording, sneaking into the
red will introduce horrible digital clipping. Always use your ears,
though; the peak markers on your DAWs UI may err on the side of
caution. I use Pro Tools Lite, and thats definitely the case - I can
quite safely push the meters momentarily into the red without hearing
any ill effects.
On the other hand, you dont want the overall track level to be too low,
otherwise you wont be making full use of the available bits.
>
> But I noticed elsewhere that someone suggested miking up an unplugged
> electric guitar to get an acoustic rhythm sound. I tried this with an
> SM58 mic but could only manage -20dB peak even when turning the
> channel preamp trim all the way up on my Yamaha MG10/2 mixer.
Well, the SM58 is a dynamic mic, and theyre designed to deal with high
volume signals. For the low volume of an unplugged electric, a condenser
mic might be a better choice.
> On a related point. When mixing, what is a good ball park level for
> just the drums + bass mixed together to provide a bed for the song.
> Again, -6dB, seems a good figure. The rest of the instruments & vocals
> can then be piled on top of that.
As long as youre not overloading the converters or underusing the bit
depth, any relative ...dB level figures are pretty meaningless.
Concentrate on getting each track recorded with the best fidelity
possible... after all, youll be adjusting the level, panning and eq for
every track when you mix the song.
If two hot tracks overload the mix buss when theyre combined, reduce
the level of both of them (and, therefore, the level of the other
tracks, to preserve the relative levels in the mix).
Adrian
--
THE VIEW FROM THE SPAGHETTI FACTORY
http://www.spaghetti-factory.co.uk