John Mercer wrote:
> Rick Booth wrote in message
news:...
>
>>Andy Hill wrote:
>>
>>>Frank Jones wrote:
>>>
>>>>Andy Hill wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>can someone let me know if this is visible ?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Yep, youre visible.
>>>
>>>must be just Paul Simpson thats being an ignorant cunt again ;-)
>>
>>On this evidence, youd be better off not being visible. I rather think
>>you owe us, or rather Paul, an explanation and apology.
>>
>>And no, a winking smiley doesnt make it all right.
>>
>>- rfb
>>
>>rick@rfbooth.com
http://www.rfbooth.com/ My opinions are.
>> Pardon the colloquialism, but what the FUCK have you been eating
>> Adrian?! Well, I for one wont stand for it! I mean, *spiky*. For
>> FUCKS sake... -- Mr Clark disturbs Paul Simpson, in ukmg
>
>
> erm, Im not sure what your specific objection to this post is but if
> its the swearing I find that rather hypocritical (At least he didnt
> capitalise his:-)
>
Firstly the swearing was a quote (ironically from Paul).
I think the objection is calling someone ignorant in such strong terms -
had you just said ignorant and added the smiley, that would have worked,
but you didnt - hence the objections.
> I also feel that a winking smiley does make a very big difference in
> this case.
>
Not big enough, Im afraid.
Cheers
James